Ibby Investor Wiki¶
Elevator Pitch
Ibby turns hiring into a shortlist delivery problem, not a sourcing-and-screening problem. Companies and candidates describe their needs once; Ibby converts that into structured claims, then delivers a bounded flow of decision-ready Qualified Match Briefs (QMBs). A mutual handshake mechanism turns shared interest into real first conversations, without the volume spiral.
Start here¶
-
2-minute skim (this page)
Read the bold section headers below to get the story in one pass.
-
10-minute tour (3 pages)
The deck-equivalent narrative, broken into three fast clicks. Start here
-
Deep diligence
Jump to the evidence: policies, assumptions, risks, and detailed answers.
-
Blue Ocean Strategy
See our core positioning logic, market levers we eliminate/reduce/raise/create, and how our approach makes competition irrelevant.
How to read this wiki¶
This site is organized like an investor deck, but with click-through proof behind each "slide."
- If a section reads like a slide headline, the bullets are the talk track.
- If you want depth, each section links to the underlying artifact (GTM, pricing, policy, cost model, etc.).
- If something reads like a claim, assume the linked doc is the support.
Deck map¶
Use this as your table of contents with intent:
1) Problem
- Why volume-based hiring breaks (for both sides)
- Deep dive: Diligence FAQ
2) Solution
- Claim-based profiles + interrogation + decision-ready briefs
- Deep dive: Core Mechanics
3) Why now
- LLM UX makes structured "claims + interrogation" feasible
- Reliability becomes the differentiator in a saturated volume market
4) Business model
- Per-role subscription, priced on qualified throughput (not seats, not volume)
- Deep dive: Pricing FAQ
5) GTM and activation gates
- Phase 1 (agents) -> Phase 2 (matching)
- Metrics and activation thresholds
- Deep dive: GTM Strategy
6) Defensibility
- Moat is system-level: structured claims + interrogation trails + enforced reciprocity
- Deep dive: Defensibility
7) Economics
- Phase 1 burn is primarily people; compute is controllable
- Deep dive: Phase 1 Costs, Phase 2 Costs
The narrative in one screen¶
1) The problem: hiring is a volume arms race¶
- Employers pay in screening + coordination time.
- Candidates pay in ghosting + low-signal application spam.
- Everyone optimizes for throughput, but the system rewards volume over clarity.
2) The insight: constrain flow, increase certainty¶
Ibby does not try to "show you more candidates." It tries to show you fewer, better candidates, faster.
- Structured claims make fit comparable.
- Interrogation makes uncertainty explicit.
- A bounded flow prevents reverting to triage.
- A handshake makes "interest" mean something.
3) The solution: QMBs + handshake¶
- Qualified Match Brief (QMB): a decision-ready packet you can review and interrogate before spending live interview time.
- Handshake: mutual commitment that converts shared interest into a real first conversation.
What we are building¶
Phase 1: Agents¶
inventory + distribution
Phase 1 proves that shareable role/candidate "agents" spread through real workflows and create interrogation that improves claim quality over time.
- Output: match-ready inventory by archetype
- Proof: the workflow stands alone even before matching is turned on
Read: GTM Strategy
Phase 2: matching¶
outcomes + liquidity
Turn on matching when inventory is sufficient to reliably produce QMBs for an archetype.
- Output: reliable intros, not just "matches"
- Measures: brief yield and mutual affirm rates
Read: GTM Strategy
IMAGE PLACEHOLDER: "Phase 1 -> Phase 2 flywheel"
File:
assets/home/phases-flywheel.pngWhat it should contain: a loop: Agents shared -> questions asked -> claims improve -> match-ready inventory -> matching -> QMB -> handshake -> intro -> success stories -> more sharing
What makes this credible¶
This section is meant to remove guesswork and highlight what is already "real."
Proof points we can show (TODO)¶
- Prototype/demo: [TODO link]
- Example QMB: [TODO link or embed]
- Reliability posture: policies exist (SLA + handshake)
- Economics posture: cost model exists and is falsifiable
Common investor questions¶
"Why can't LinkedIn copy this?"¶
This is a system and an incentive posture, not a feature. It requires enforced reciprocity and de-optimizing volume.
Read: Defensibility
"How do you avoid fraud or polished fiction?"¶
Ibby does not certify truth, but it makes truth cheaper to validate and deception harder to sustain by forcing structured claims and preserving interrogation trails.
Read: Diligence FAQ
"How do you guarantee quality, not volume?"¶
Delivery is qualified-only and governed by explicit standards. If there are no qualified matches, you get none.
Read: Mutual SLA
The raise (TODO)¶
TODO: fill this in (keep it blunt and slide-like)
- Raising: $[X] pre-seed
- Use of funds: [product build] + [inventory] + [first archetype pilots]
- What "done" looks like in 6-9 months:
- [X] match-ready inventory in archetype 1
- [Y] roles piloted
- [Z] handshake intros completed
Content Index¶
also available in the lefthand nav
-
Tour
-
Narrative and diligence
-
Economics
-
Blue Ocean Strategy





